以琳自闭症论坛

 找回密码
 注册 (请写明注册原因,12小时内通过审核)
查看: 6738|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

孩子的重复语言多怎么办?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2003-8-26 08:41:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
我的孩子老是抓隹一个问题问好几遍,不知该怎么办??



22#
发表于 2008-2-24 10:30:06 | 只看该作者

re:谢谢Carol,不过这篇文章讲的是鹦鹉学...

谢谢Carol,不过这篇文章讲的是鹦鹉学舌,而上一页的朋友们讲的是小孩重复提问题。

你引用的这个网站我去看了一下,里面有一个自闭症和性教育的专栏,也许对大孩子有用。

http://groups.msn.com/TheAutismHomePage/treatingecholalia.msnw

回复

使用道具 举报

21#
发表于 2008-2-23 23:08:44 | 只看该作者

re:Why do children echo...

Why do children echo?

Lovaas (1981) says that echolalia most likely is not something that we have inadvertently reinforced in the child with autism. He believes that more than likely echolalia is something that is intrinsically rewarding to the child. Lovaas believes that the reinforcer is actually the child being able to match what others say. Many children with autism become experts not just at echoing the content of what is said by others (the words) but also the voice, inflexion, and manner in which the words were originally spoken. The value of echolalia for the person may be that the echoed words and contextual cues become stored information for the person to refer to later as an internal rehearsal of the event.

As we have stated earlier, echolalia appears to be a "normal" step in the child with autism's cognitive and language maturation. To further examine the why of echolalia, review Tables 1 and 2, which detail the many possible functions echolalia may serve for the person with autism. In short, people use echolalia because it works for them. The answer then, may be teaching the person another and more efficient way to fulfill the function that is served by the echolalia.

What can be done?

The presence of echolalia has actually been identified as a positive sign in persons with autism. Lovaas (1977) found that the presence of echolalia is an important prognostic indicator for future language growth. It appears that echolalia provides the "raw material" for further language growth. Howlin (1981), in fact, discovered that children with autism who were echolalic developed good phrase speech later in life whether or not they received intensive language training. If you think of echolalia as one of the phases of normal language development, it would appear that continued echolalia indicates that the person with autism is "stuck" at that level of development for a time but then seems to overcome it and develop more normal speech patterns. Lovaas (1981) believes that children who were once mute and later develop good speech, inevitably have passed through an echolalic stage in their speech development.

Far from being a useless "habit," echolalia has actually been used to teach receptive naming of objects (Charlop, 1983) and Chinese characters (Leung & Wu, 1997) to persons with autism. These studies further support the finding that echolalia serves a purpose for the person with autism.

Regardless of the utility of echolalia for the person with autism, the habit can interfere with social interaction and learning. Therefore, most researchers focus on helping the person move to a more creative form of language. Schreibman & Carr (1978) noted that the person with autism was more likely to use echolalia when he or she had not learned an appropriate response to the question or command. This seems rather obvious and their choice of treatment for echolalia was almost ashamedly obvious: they taught persons with autism to say, "I don't know" to questions they previously echoed and did not know the answer to. Even if "I don't know" became an echoed phrase, it is the most frequent response you will get from any child when you ask them a question they do not know the answer to. An additional benefit of this approach is that the "I don't know" response tells the person asking the question that he or she needs to teach the appropriate answer to the person. Just great common sense!

Schreibman and Carr (1978) taught the children to say "I don't know" in this fashion: 10 "what", 10 "how", and 10 "who" questions that the child did not know the answers to were prepared ahead of time (e.g., "What are we doing?" "How is your tummy?" "Who are my friends?"). One of them was selected and the child was asked the question and the "I don't know" answer was immediately prompted (e.g., "How do trucks run?-I don't know."). If the child echoed "I don't know" he or she was immediately reinforced. Eventually the "I don't know" prompt was faded (gradually removed) and the child was reinforced only for answering "I don't know" when not prompted. Once the child learned to say "I don't know" to one question, he or she was asked another of the prepared questions. If "I don't know" did not generalize to this new question, it was taught in the same manner as before. The researchers found that training a child to respond to an unknown question with "I don't know" in a few instances, led to the child being able to use this new phrase appropriately when asked other questions they did not know the answer to (generalization). At the same time, the researchers found that the child continued to appropriately answer questions they did know the answer to (e.g., "What is your name?"). Ivar Lovaas (1981) recommends this procedure in the Me Book and has a good five-step procedure for overcoming echolalia using Schreibman & Carr's (1978) "I don't know" method.

Another approach to dealing with echolalia, that goes along with the finding that echolalia is more likely to occur when the person is asked questions or given commands they do not know the correct response to, is to teach the correct response. This can easily be done by prompting the person with the correct response immediately after asking the question (e.g., "What is a rose?-flower.") and then reinforcing the echo and eventually fading the prompt. However, this is not a practical way to deal with echolalia for two reasons: it reinforces echolalia for a time and you would literally have to teach the person answers to every question that could be asked of them. Nevertheless, teaching the child with autism an appropriate response to commonly asked questions (e.g., "What is your name?") is a very good strategy to deal with some echolalic responses.

McMorrow & Foxx (1986) used what I believe to be the preferred method of overcoming echolalia. It uses the best of all the previous methods but adds the teaching of an important skill for persons with autism: the pause. The method is known as the Cues-Pause-Point method. I will attempt to simplify the method for you so that you can implement it at home or school:

The Cues-Pause-Point Method for Overcoming Echolalia
(based on McMorrow & Foxx, 1986)

1. Select 10 questions from each of three content areas: a. Identification - (e.g., "What is your name? Where do you live?); b. Interaction - (e.g., "How are you? What kind of music do you like?"); c. Factual - (e.g., "What state do you live in? What baseball team plays in Atlanta?"). Make sure these are questions that may be commonly asked but you are sure the person does not know the answer to. You should have 30 questions.

2. Baseline. Ask each of the questions, record the answers, and score the person's answers using the following categories: echolalia (when one or more of the words in the question were repeated even if other verbalizations follow); incorrect (when the response contains an irrelevant word even if the correct response was also given); or correct (when the answer is appropriate to the question or matches the trained response).

3. Training - Step 1: Teach the person to verbally label word cards or picture cards that will be used to prompt the correct answer to the questions. For example, for the question "What is your name?", prepare a card with the written name of the person. For the question "What baseball team plays in Atlanta?", prepare a card with the word "Braves" written on it or a picture of the "Braves" logo. Accomplish the training by showing the card, asking the person "What does this say?" while pointing or tapping the card, prompting a response, providing verbal feedback (either "yes!" or "try again"), saying the correct word if the person does not say it and prompting the person to repeat it, and giving verbal praise and a reinforcer (e.g., sip of soda, piece of candy, etc.) for each correct response. Continue training each set of 10 cards until the person correctly identifies each card or picture when the trainer simply points to them, for three consecutive trials.

4. Training - Step 2: Make sure you are in a quiet place with no distractions. Sit across the table from the person. Have the ten cards that correspond to the ten questions that you will ask (placed in the order you will ask the questions) on the table in front of you. Hold up your right index finger at eye level midway between you and the person to indicate that you want silence (this is the "pause" prompt). Say, "I am going to ask you some questions and I want you to answer them as best you can." If the person says anything or tries to talk during the instructions, while the question is asked, or for one second following the question, say, "Shh!" and hold your finger out more prominently. Ask the first question and move your right index finger from the "pause" prompt position to point to the correct response card (which will be the answer to the question asked) so that your finger touches it about two seconds after asking the question. If the person does not immediately say the correct word, prompt by pointing or saying, "What does this say?", as necessary. Cover the card with your right hand while acknowledging the person's correct response with a smile or head nod. Raise your left index finger to eye level (the "pause" prompt position), ask the same question again, and move the left index finger to point to the back of the right hand (still covering the card). Prompt the correct answer as before even though the card will remain covered. Reinforce each correct answer with verbal praise and a reinforcer (e.g., sip of soda, piece of candy, etc.). Continue in this manner so that each of the ten questions in this content area are asked and at later sessions cover the ten questions from each of the other two content areas. Continue training on the 30 questions until the person is correctly answering each question with only the point prompt for three consecutive training sessions.

5. Training - Step 3: Using no cards or prompts, ask each of the 10 questions in three different training sessions. Use the "pause" prompt while the question is being asked and then move your hand back to the table and wait for the person's response. Provide feedback and reinforcement as above.

6. Training - Step 4: Fade the feedback and reinforcements by reducing the number of words you use to praise the person and rewarding every other correct response. Eventually eliminate all feedback and reinforcements. Once the person is answering your questions in a consistently correct and normal manner, have other persons ask the same questions in random order to assure that the person has generalized his learning.

7. Maintenance: Observe the person's response to asking other questions (not trained) and use the "pause" prompt if needed. Ignore echoed responses, prompt the correct answer, and have him try again. McMorrow & Foxx (1986) found that echolalic responses were dramatically reduced after their training program was used. Ideally, the person has been taught that "I don't know" is an acceptable response and a wrong response will get more results than an echoed response.

The Alternated Modeling Method for Overcoming Echolalia
(based on McMorrow & Foxx, 1986)

Modeling would appear to be an ideal training method to use with persons who are prone to echolalia. McMorrow & Foxx (1986) used this very simple procedure to treat echolalia. It involves the same set up procedure as the Cues-Pause-Point model above. That is, select 10 questions from each of three content areas: a. Identification - (e.g., "What is your name? Where do you live?); b. Interaction - (e.g., "How are you? What kind of music do you like?"); c. Factual - (e.g., "What state do you live in? What baseball team plays in Atlanta?"). Make sure these are questions that may be commonly asked but you are sure the person does not know the answer to. You should have 30 questions. Then conduct a baseline: Ask each of the questions, record the answers, and score the person's answers using the following categories: echolalia (when one or more of the words in the question were repeated even if other verbalizations follow); incorrect (when the response contains an irrelevant word even if the correct response was also given); or correct (when the answer is appropriate to the question or matches the trained response). Next select a model. The model should be someone who can answer the questions correctly. Set up the training room as above with both the model and the person you are training seated across the table from you. Begin with the model and ask the first question. Provide feedback and reinforcement for the correct answer. Then look at the person and ask the same question and provide feedback and reinforcement for correct responses. Continue until the ten questions for that content area are asked and then complete the other content area questions at later training sessions. Once the person is answering correctly 100% of the time with the model present, it is time to ask the questions of the person without the model. Keep track of the responses as in the baseline and work toward 100% correctness. Fade the reinforcers and have other persons ask the questions to assure generalization has occurred.

A General Approach to Responding to Echolalia

The Judevine® Center for Autism recommends using the following procedure when a person with autism engages in echolalia: Treatment for echolalia involves responding to the person literally. If the person echoes, "Do you want juice?" (after you have asked the question), say: "No thank you. Follow this with: "I think you want to tell me something though." Then use sign language or another prompt to get the person to say, "I want some juice." A good technique is to use a "starter sentence" like: "I want some ______," and let them fill in the blank (show him the juice). Similarly, if you ask the person, "Do you want a cookie? Yes or no," and the person echoes your last word ("no"), accept this response. Say, "You said 'no', that's okay, I will eat the cookie myself." If it looks like the person does indeed want a cookie, say, "It looks like you changed your mind, if you want a cookie, say, 'yes'." Prompt for a "yes" and reinforce a correct response.
回复

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 2008-2-23 14:33:40 | 只看该作者

re:还在想办法

还在想办法
回复

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 2008-2-22 16:01:31 | 只看该作者

re:接受孩子的这种情况!发生时转移孩子的注意...

接受孩子的这种情况!发生时转移孩子的注意力!
回复

使用道具 举报

18#
发表于 2008-2-18 14:04:19 | 只看该作者

re:发现孩子这个问题后,我才知道以琳,上了以...

发现孩子这个问题后,我才知道以琳,上了以琳,才真正懂得“可怜天下父母心”,我从网上论坛知道了北六院,南京脑科,也知道了邹小兵,我们已电话约了4月21日去广州。但我知道不管孩子是不是,现在都得及时干预。好煎熬啊,愿我们所有的孩子都能恢复得好好的。哪些家长有好的方法请赐教,万分感谢!!!
回复

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2008-2-18 13:58:35 | 只看该作者

re:在我儿子两岁时,我发现他也是一看见钟表就...

在我儿子两岁时,我发现他也是一看见钟表就问几点了,你回答了以后,他仍然问几点了。当时没在意,最近他差十几天就三岁,半年时间内他又好重复:这是什么?不管看见什么,知道不知道的他都问:这是什么?然后你反问他:你说这是什么,他会准确回答。并且他对语言的理解力比较低,你要教他说什么话,如我对他说:“你说再见”,他跟着讲“你说再见”经常是这样,我有时很沮丧,也不知该用什么方法来引导。去一些培训机构,才发现这样的孩子挺多,他们也建议干预,可如何科学正确干预呢?我很困惑
回复

使用道具 举报

16#
发表于 2008-2-17 21:34:41 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复

使用道具 举报

15#
发表于 2006-9-22 21:30:31 | 只看该作者

re:我觉得这是因为孩子对交流方式的理解问题。...

我觉得这是因为孩子对交流方式的理解问题。我们经常会问孩子同样的问题,总觉得孩子不明白,所以不厌其烦的问了一遍又一遍,训练的老师也是这样,可能因此导致我们的孩子认为这样就是正常的交流方式。所以我们在日常生活中可能需要尽量减少问相同的问题的次数,而以正常的交流方式来对孩子说话,使他们明白怎样的交流方式才是正常的。
回复

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 2006-9-22 14:34:10 | 只看该作者

re:我儿子也是,最近总在问"哪一个是香蕉?"...

我儿子也是,最近总在问"哪一个是香蕉?""哪一个是苹果?"然后自己回答.
回复

使用道具 举报

13#
发表于 2006-9-22 14:17:25 | 只看该作者

re:我的孩子也是天天起床就问起床了干什么?...

我的孩子也是天天起床就问起床了干什么?我告诉他要刷牙,然后又问刷牙干什么......其实他知道一天都要做些什么的,就是老是不停的问,请问有经验的家长我该怎样引导孩子?
回复

使用道具 举报

12#
发表于 2006-7-12 10:03:50 | 只看该作者

re:我觉得孩子重复说话也是一种学习的过程。我...

我觉得孩子重复说话也是一种学习的过程。我儿子以前一段时间自言自语,过了一段时间又重复问你一个问题,现在他又重复问你一件事,现在证明他自言自语的和问的都是他所想的,只是在当时他不能正确表述自己的想法,现在他能讲出他小时候发生的事情,在当时那时不可能的,因此我觉得这是孩子一个不断进步学习的过程,需要大人正确的引导。愿我们的孩子不断进步1
回复

使用道具 举报

11#
发表于 2006-7-10 22:34:46 | 只看该作者

re:看来这属于自闭的通病

看来这属于自闭的通病
回复

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 2006-7-10 09:02:23 | 只看该作者

re:我儿子也是这样的。原先告诉他说一遍就行,...

我儿子也是这样的。原先告诉他说一遍就行,结果他重复后,我一看他,他就加上“说一遍就行”。需要我们随时都要思维敏捷,才能把他引入深入。
回复

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2006-7-7 10:14:26 | 只看该作者

re:我的孩子也总是出现这样的问题,我很愁,告...

我的孩子也总是出现这样的问题,我很愁,告诉他,他也控制不住,总说就说一遍,谁有好方法多谈谈
回复

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 2006-7-6 15:21:03 | 只看该作者

re:我儿子也是这样,在受到教训时表现特别突出...

我儿子也是这样,在受到教训时表现特别突出,应该是在寻求心理安慰。我试着在儿子重复时安抚他,但效果不太好。
回复

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 2006-7-6 14:59:21 | 只看该作者

re:其实重复也是一种学习过程,一般的孩子也通...

其实重复也是一种学习过程,一般的孩子也通过重复听讲来掌握语言.我们的孩子接受外来信息能力比较差,他自己通过反复同一问题来加深认识.作为家长我们一定要耐心引导他们,帮助他们. 
回复

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 2006-7-6 13:24:18 | 只看该作者

re:重复问问题,重复答问题,这是很多自闭儿的...

重复问问题,重复答问题,这是很多自闭儿的通病,这个问题也有各种说法.有一种认知上的观点,认为是孩子不懂,需要教他们怎样提问.
但我更倾向于心理上的原因,总的来说,自闭症孩子在外界世界的各种刺激下,不能很顺利地把握住自己的处境.所以他们以所谓的'刻板行为'来制造出一种不变的程式,借以达到心理上的安全感.语言上的刻板,也可以看成是'刻板行为'的一种延伸.他们一而再地问同样一个问题,往往不是说他们不知道答案,而是他们早以知道了答案,但他们就等着你说出他们已经知道的答案.如果你说出了答案,他们往往会发脾气.他们就是想从这些一问一答中得到心理上的满足.
如果你认为这种假设是有道理的话,那么首先你应该尊重他们的这一行为,因为这也是他们的一种心理需要.不要贸然地指责,训斥.尽量耐心地回答他,但也想法拓展他的思路.如果孩子的接受能力可以的话,就要直接对他说明这样重复提问是不恰当的,会让别人厌烦的.
回复

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 2006-7-6 10:06:13 | 只看该作者

re:我儿子也是。从5月份以来因为做感统经常做...

我儿子也是。从5月份以来因为做感统经常做车,所以现在对公交车异常感兴趣,这是不是自闭儿的通病呢。只要看到公交车一定会非常兴奋的告诉我“妈妈,**路公交车”,并且眼神特好,隔着很远就能分辨出那是哪一路车。

真不知怎样去引导。
回复

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 2006-7-6 07:32:10 | 只看该作者

re:我的孩子也是这个毛病呀,我想是不是因为焦...

我的孩子也是这个毛病呀,我想是不是因为焦虑的关系,不过有时也不太象,可能是觉得好玩或想引大人们的注意吧
回复

使用道具 举报

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|以琳自闭症论坛

GMT+8, 2024-11-25 21:18

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表